|
| Author
|
Post |
 
|
|
Dan Moilanen
F L I N T O I D
|
quote:
twotap schreef:
quote:
so pan, you make six figures? twotap, whatever. you say you could buy and sell a "punk" like me? what's your level of education? How much do you make? I for one know that I am; 1. smarter than you, 2. make a lot more money than you, 3. have a much more important and fulfilling job than you, 4. and probably have a better looking wife and kids than you.
Holy shit Baracko Bama is on the Flint forum.  Actually backagain old Fstar is the one who started with the personal insults and I was just showing I can insult with the best of them. I see his recent post has kept up his idiotic demeanor. Hey Fstar ill show ya mine if you show me yours. Fuc---- liberal dimwit. Oh ya one more thing ill bet my Nova can blow the doors off anything your driving, oh wait a green mobile driver never mind.
Haha, he attacks twotap with a question regarding his income and whether or not his career if fulfilling, and then twotap responds by saying his car is better... bahahahahahhahahaha.
This is explains a lot. |
_________________
-Dan
"I am not a Marxist."
-Karl Marx |
|
Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:52 pm |
|
|
twotap
F L I N T O I D
|
| Hey Karl Marx Molinananen your response to Fstar was too quick you guys sharing the same keyboard among other things???You missed the best part back up a post or two. Oh come here Danny twotap is picking on me. |
_________________
"If you like your current healthcare you can keep it, Period"!!
Barack Hussein Obama--- multiple times. |
|
|
Wed Jul 22, 2009 6:00 pm |
|
|
pan8
F L I N T O I D
|
I find it interesting that FStar will not respond when asked on whose behalf he lobbies. I think FStar is a legend in his own "mind."
2tap, if I may say so, you have a rather good looking wife. Now about your kids - - - - - 
Pan8 |
|
|
|
Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:29 pm |
|
|
mutt of flint
F L I N T O I D
|
Neither did anyone answer his question about whether anyone on this board makes 6 figures or my question about how much employers are currently spending on health care. Come on now, this has turned into a hugely childish affair. Name calling? Really? Apparently we're all 6 now.
Back on subject, yes he's losing support for the bill. Finally he's stuck to his guns and stopped the party pandering. I know everyone seems to think we'll be a socialist state after this passes (it will, in some form), but lets think about this a second. This bill is "based" on a policy from canada. So...canada is a socialist country? Secondly, the fact that it is based on canada's policy does not suggest it's canada's policy. Next, a lot has been made about whether canadians are happy with the health care, well, what do you think? Its still a part of their govenment. If it worked so bad, don't you think they would push for something different that did work? I mean (& by all means consider this as a cheap shot, but its true), they aren't us. When stuff doesn't work we go "just a little longer...maybe another 30-40 years, it'll work itself out." My last point is are any of you against this bill going to reject medicare when its offered to you? Its the same thing on a larger scale. Okay, start calling me a big doody head who drinks his own pee...or answer what I ask for once. |
_________________
I'm not a polarized. deal with it. |
|
|
Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:22 pm |
|
|
Adam
F L I N T O I D
|
I think what we should do is legalize some alternative medicines, and fight the drug cartels, and the doctor cartel. We have a shortage of doctors in America but medical schools are not accepting students. We also need tort reform (lawsuit limits).
We do need to look at Canada's system because their drug prices are way lower as well as France/Europe's "socialism" because they likely found some worthwhile ways to cut costs. If we spent less overseas we could also cut taxes so people could afford to buy health insurance. |
|
|
|
Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:39 pm |
|
|
mutt of flint
F L I N T O I D
|
Adam, for once, we agree. Don't get used to it  . Except, taxes aren't the issue as much as who is being taxed. We're going to get taxed no matter what. We might as well get something good out of the deal. if we let business run wild again out of fear of being socialists that will lead us right back to here and a wild, unmonitored insurance industry is how we got here in the first place, including the fact that we allow drug companys to advertise drugs on tv like their pepsi. I'm with you on the legalizing and distribution of drugs that are a part of the so called "war on drugs." Can anyone tell me the real danger in pot? Please? Lol. Ridiculous. It would be nice to force the cartels into doing legal business as they'd fall apart under the pressure. |
_________________
I'm not a polarized. deal with it. |
|
|
Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:03 pm |
|
|
Dan Moilanen
F L I N T O I D
|
quote:
twotap schreef:
Hey Karl Marx Molinananen your response to Fstar was too quick you guys sharing the same keyboard among other things???You missed the best part back up a post or two. Oh come here Danny twotap is picking on me.
I'm sure you've never actually read any Marx before. I bet there's an outside chance that you may have read the manifesto, but that's definitely not his best work since it was written for the party and it's polemic in nature. He wrote it for the "common worker" in the nineteenth century. But you probably could understand it now, anyway.
Everyone fails to at least find mutual respect for him, until they read anything by Marx.
If you're up for some REAL reading, read Capital  |
_________________
-Dan
"I am not a Marxist."
-Karl Marx |
|
|
Thu Jul 23, 2009 12:47 am |
|
|
Adam
F L I N T O I D
|
quote:
mutt of flint schreef:
Adam, for once, we agree. Don't get used to it . Except, taxes aren't the issue as much as who is being taxed. We're going to get taxed no matter what. We might as well get something good out of the deal. if we let business run wild again out of fear of being socialists that will lead us right back to here and a wild, unmonitored insurance industry is how we got here in the first place, including the fact that we allow drug companys to advertise drugs on tv like their pepsi. I'm with you on the legalizing and distribution of drugs that are a part of the so called "war on drugs." Can anyone tell me the real danger in pot? Please? Lol. Ridiculous. It would be nice to force the cartels into doing legal business as they'd fall apart under the pressure.
I think individuals could spend the money better than the government. Pot is a very serious threat to drug companies. |
|
|
|
Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:21 am |
|
|
mutt of flint
F L I N T O I D
|
quote:
Adam schreef:
quote:
mutt of flint schreef:
Adam, for once, we agree. Don't get used to it . Except, taxes aren't the issue as much as who is being taxed. We're going to get taxed no matter what. We might as well get something good out of the deal. if we let business run wild again out of fear of being socialists that will lead us right back to here and a wild, unmonitored insurance industry is how we got here in the first place, including the fact that we allow drug companys to advertise drugs on tv like their pepsi. I'm with you on the legalizing and distribution of drugs that are a part of the so called "war on drugs." Can anyone tell me the real danger in pot? Please? Lol. Ridiculous. It would be nice to force the cartels into doing legal business as they'd fall apart under the pressure.
I think individuals could spend the money better than the government. Pot is a very serious threat to drug companies.
very true, but as long as there is no legitimate american industry for employment, the need to spend the money is there. None of it matters as long as people aren't working, whether higher or lower taxes. At the time currently, it should be expected of the rich to give more than horde like they've been known to do. If its good for most of america who need it rather than those who have it and want more then I don't understand how it could be argued against them pitching in. Ultimately the goal is to drop the price of insurance, medications, and procedures. Procedures are the biggest problem as they cost the most.
Pot doesn't have to be a threat to them if they are the ones selling it. There's another source of tax revenue right there too. |
_________________
I'm not a polarized. deal with it. |
|
|
Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:37 pm |
|
|
Adam
F L I N T O I D
|
quote:
mutt of flint schreef:
as long as there is no legitimate american industry for employment, the need to spend the money is there. None of it matters as long as people aren't working, whether higher or lower taxes. At the time currently, it should be expected of the rich to give more than horde like they've been known to do. If its good for most of america who need it rather than those who have it and want more then I don't understand how it could be argued against them pitching in. Ultimately the goal is to drop the price of insurance, medications, and procedures. Procedures are the biggest problem as they cost the most.
Pot doesn't have to be a threat to them if they are the ones selling it. There's another source of tax revenue right there too.
We do have some legitimate industries but having the government spend another trillion or so to creat an illigitmate health industry is not a good solution. Ideally we need to destroy America's primary industry which is exporting our fiat currency/money (inflation) creation.
Pot is a major threat because people can grow it themselves and not have to buy it from the drug companies who also can't get patents on it. Marijuana would be like a generic aspirin coming on the market. Just think if you could take a cheap "generic aspirin" instead of paying $1,000 of dollars for a patented chemo drug. |
|
|
|
Thu Jul 23, 2009 4:51 pm |
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
FlintTalk.com Forum Index
> Political Talk
