Author
|
Post |
|
|
DELETED
Guest
|
DELETED |
_________________ Guest post |
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:37 pm |
|
|
Ryan Eashoo
F L I N T O I D
|
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:02 pm |
|
|
Ryan Eashoo
F L I N T O I D
|
I say she should resign, or the City Council should remove her. If there ever was a good time for a RECALL that time is now on Jackie P.
I heard she is related to the other Felon named Donna Poplar???? Is that true? Maybe it runs in the family??? |
|
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:03 pm |
|
|
Ted Jankowski
F L I N T O I D
|
quote:
I say she should resign, or the City Council should remove her. If there ever was a good time for a RECALL that time is now on Jackie P.
I heard she is related to the other Felon named Donna Poplar???? Is that true? Maybe it runs in the family???
WOW,
And people think I say things that are OUTRADGEOUS!!!
I love this online forum. People speaking about things they don't have a clue about! Then make uneducated flaming statements such as this. |
|
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 6:42 pm |
|
|
Ted Jankowski
F L I N T O I D
|
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 7:11 pm |
|
|
JB Richards
Guest
|
Wasn’t Poplar one who criticized Teflon Don for abusing his office? Sounds like the pot calling the kettle black. (No pun intended.) Poplar should absolutely set an example and resign. |
|
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 7:56 pm |
|
|
Chris
Guest
|
She is related, I remember it was an issue when Donna Poplar was trying to become ombudsman. I think she should resign also, it takes a crook to know one I say.
|
|
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:24 pm |
|
|
Adam Ford
F L I N T O I D
|
This is old news. I knew about this months ago. I think it's interesting timing for the mayor to come out with this months after the fact. I know it is wrong for Jackie Poplar to use her influence for the benefit of kids but I'm sure if she had the city attorney defend her like the city attorney defends Don she would not have had to make any apologizing. Perhaps the kids would even still have their scholarship money.
I wish people would care about enforcing the charter as much as they care about punishing someone because they were not aware of bribery laws and wanted to help kids and did not have Trachelle Young did.
In addition if you care about 1,000 scholarship money perhaps you should care more about the millions Don tried to make off of the casino deal. |
|
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:02 pm |
|
|
John
Guest
|
quote:
Ted Jankowski schreef:
quote:
I say she should resign, or the City Council should remove her. If there ever was a good time for a RECALL that time is now on Jackie P.
I heard she is related to the other Felon named Donna Poplar???? Is that true? Maybe it runs in the family???
WOW,
And people think I say things that are OUTRADGEOUS!!!
I love this online forum. People speaking about things they don't have a clue about! Then make uneducated flaming statements such as this.
Ted why are you so negative all the time? You are, just read your posts. |
|
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:24 pm |
|
|
Steve Myers
Site Admin
|
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:27 pm |
|
|
Al Garcia
Guest
|
quote:
Ted Jankowski schreef:
quote:
I say she should resign, or the City Council should remove her. If there ever was a good time for a RECALL that time is now on Jackie P.
I heard she is related to the other Felon named Donna Poplar???? Is that true? Maybe it runs in the family???
WOW,
And people think I say things that are OUTRADGEOUS!!!
I love this online forum. People speaking about things they don't have a clue about! Then make uneducated flaming statements such as this.
WOW.......I think we have hit an all time low in my short time forum. I couldnt agree with you more Ted!
Come on Eashoo, you can do better then that! |
|
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:31 pm |
|
|
Ted Jankowski
F L I N T O I D
|
John?
Do you know the difference between Negative Words and positive action words?
You might want to reread my posts. |
|
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:34 pm |
|
|
John Wilson
F L I N T O I D
|
...great! This is an excellent, dynamic show. The chemistry and spunk these guys have keeps me watching.
As a film producer, I'd like to see the content keep getting better, deeper, and wittier. Keep me guessing what you're going to do next! That's the formula for any successful show.
Also, can you try some better production values to take your show to the next level?
1. Get a guy to do your camera work. Framing both of you is key
2. Do some editing with some music and have segues into different segments (any cheap video editor will do)
3. You need a theme song/logo/title
I confess I think you've inspired me to add a show of my own, so you can poke holes in mine when it airs.
Again, great show and keep 'em coming. Are there bios of the hosts anywhere?
Thanks guys! |
|
|
Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:49 pm |
|
|
Al Garcia
Guest
|
quote:
Ted Jankowski schreef:
John?
Do you know the difference between Negative Words and positive action words?
You might want to reread my posts.
I have to agree with him, you can be very negative |
|
|
Sat Dec 02, 2006 1:56 am |
|
|
Jonathan Swift
Guest
|
quote:
roscoevanzandt schreef:
...great! This is an excellent, dynamic show. The chemistry and spunk these guys have keeps me watching.
As a film producer, I'd like to see the content keep getting better, deeper, and wittier. Keep me guessing what you're going to do next! That's the formula for any successful show.
Also, can you try some better production values to take your show to the next level?
1. Get a guy to do your camera work. Framing both of you is key
2. Do some editing with some music and have segues into different segments (any cheap video editor will do)
3. You need a theme song/logo/title
I confess I think you've inspired me to add a show of my own, so you can poke holes in mine when it airs.
Again, great show and keep 'em coming. Are there bios of the hosts anywhere?
Thanks guys!
Satire is a sort of glass, wherein beholders do generally discover everybodys face but their own.
Jonathan Swift
The Battle of the Books
1704
HE IS MOCKING YOU BOYS. Just in case you missed the point.
But then,
Mockery is often the result of poverty of wit.
La Bruyere
Characters 1688
So I guess you boys are on top in that exchange. |
|
|
Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:15 am |
|
|